FTX Used Random Numbers To Generate The Size Of Its Insurance Fund

In a startling revelation, it has come to light that FTX used random numbers to create its insurance fund, sparking significant controversy within the crypto community. This unexpected disclosure about the FTX insurance fund raises serious questions about the exchange’s risk management practices and the overall transparency in the crypto industry. Understanding the implications of this practice is crucial for investors and market participants as they navigate the evolving landscape of digital assets.

According to a testimony from FTX co-founder Gary Wang, the crypto exchange used a formula based on random numbers and daily trading volume to misrepresent the balance of its insurance fund. 

Specifically, FTX used a random number (approximately 7,500) multiplied by the platform’s daily volume and then divided by one billion to arrive at the fake balance. 

The displayed balance was reportedly manipulated using hidden Python code. 

During his testimony, Wang confirmed that the displayed number did not match the real number in the database, and the real insurance fund balance was, in fact, lower than what was showcased to the public. 

“Does that number have anything to do with the actual number in the insurance fund?” prosecutor Nicolas Roos asked. 

Wang responded, “No.” 

Insurance funds are a safeguard to pay out profits and cover losses, preventing the automatic closure of profitable positions caused by widespread counterparty liquidations.

FTX Insurance Fund

The revelation that FTX used random numbers to create its insurance fund has led to widespread concern among investors and analysts. Insurance funds are crucial for mitigating risks and ensuring the stability of trading platforms. By using arbitrary numbers, FTX may have compromised the integrity and reliability of its risk management strategies. This news not only affects FTX but also has broader implications for the trustworthiness of insurance funds in the cryptocurrency industry.

The FTX insurance fund was purportedly designed to protect traders from unforeseen market volatility and losses. However, the use of random numbers suggests a lack of rigorous methodology in its establishment. This practice could potentially expose traders to higher risks than anticipated. As the community digests this information, there is an increasing demand for greater transparency and accountability from cryptocurrency exchanges to ensure that their insurance funds are robust and genuinely protective.

One of the primary concerns arising from the FTX insurance fund controversy is the potential impact on regulatory scrutiny. Authorities may view this incident as indicative of broader systemic issues within the cryptocurrency market, prompting tighter regulations and oversight. While increased regulation could enhance investor protection, it might also stifle innovation and impose additional compliance costs on exchanges. Therefore, understanding the full scope of how FTX used random numbers to create its insurance fund is essential for anticipating future regulatory developments.

In response to the revelation, FTX has been urged to provide a detailed explanation of its practices and the rationale behind the use of random numbers in its insurance fund. Stakeholders are calling for an independent audit to assess the fund’s adequacy and the potential risks it poses to traders. By addressing these concerns transparently, FTX can begin to rebuild trust and demonstrate its commitment to maintaining a secure and reliable trading environment. The controversy surrounding the FTX insurance fund serves as a critical reminder of the importance of robust risk management frameworks in the cryptocurrency industry.

In conclusion, the news that FTX used random numbers to create its insurance fund has significant implications for the exchange and the broader crypto market. This incident highlights the need for rigorous risk management practices and greater transparency from trading platforms. As the situation unfolds, it is crucial for investors and market participants to stay informed about developments and understand the potential impact on their trading activities. By learning from this controversy, the crypto industry can work towards building more resilient and trustworthy financial infrastructures.

DOJ Wants To Block Sam Bankman-Fried From Bringing Up Anthropic AI Raise In Court

Assistant US Attorney Thane Rehn has reportedly filed a motion seeking to forbid FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried from bringing up AI company Anthropic in his trial. Notably, the filing comes as a result of prosecutors being worried about SBF’s legal team using Anthropic’s recent billion-dollar fundraising valuation as a defence strategy that intends to deflect the real impact of the FTX fraud. 

Rehn cited an earlier circumstance in which Judge Kaplan ruled, 

“It is immaterial as a matter of law whether [Bankman-Fried] intended to repay the misappropriated funds. Such evidence would therefore be wholly irrelevant, and present a substantial danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, and waste of time.” 

The DOJ has previously tried to bar Bankman-Fried’s defense team from arguing that FTX creditors will receive most or all of their funds back. 

“The Indictment alleged that the defendant committed wire fraud by misappropriating FTX customer deposits to make investments and other expenditures. It is immaterial whether some of those investments might ultimately have been profitable,” the DOJ filing said. “… Nor would it be a defense to the charges in this case if the defendant invested stolen FTX money believing that the investments would ultimately be so lucrative that he could pay back the stolen money.” 

Anthropic has an agreement with Amazon worth potentially up to $4 billion and is in talks to raise another $2 billion, Bloomberg reported last week. 

FTX took a stake in Anthropic that was worth $500 million when it filed for bankruptcy nearly a year ago. The company’s bankruptcy trustee has yet to sell the stake. 

Thomas Braziel, the founder and CEO of advisory firm 117 Partners, told CoinDesk that the news about the fundraise was a “fantastic turn of events for FTX creditors.”

Huobi, KuCoin Among Crypto Firms Added To UK Watchdog’s Warning List

The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has reportedly added several crypto exchanges, including Huobi and Kucoin, to its warning list of unauthorized firms that customers “should avoid.” 

Notably, the updated list comes as a result of the FCA enacting the country’s new Financial Promotions (FinProm) Regime for cryptocurrency firms yesterday. The new regime seeks to ensure fair, clean and transparent crypto promotions.

In response to the updated list, both Huobi and Kucoin have stated that they do not “operate or market” their services or products in the UK and that they will adjust their “products and services accordingly to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations in each country to the extent possible.” 

In a generic warning for Huobi and KuCoin among the 147 companies it added to the list, the FCA wrote: 

“This firm may be promoting financial services or products without our permission. You should avoid dealing with this firm.” 

Penalties for non-compliance can include takedown requests for websites and apps, unlimited fines and even prison time. 

Justin Sun, the crypto mogul who runs Huobi, has run into regulatory rough waters before. The US Securities and Exchange Commission in March accused Sun of fraud and market manipulation using TRX, the native cryptocurrency of his Tron blockchain. 

Huobi says it holds licenses to operate in Lithuania, Gibraltar, Dubai, Australia, British Virgin Islands, and South America, according to its website, but doesn’t list the UK as a prohibited venue. 

Seychelles-based KuCoin says its platform is restricted in countries including the US, Singapore, Hong Kong, the mainland of China, Thailand, Malaysia and Ontario, Canada. It doesn’t name the UK in its restricted locations list.